Lego makeup and tiles

Read part 1 for some context

The concept of modular design has always interested me. I like that the modules fit together neatly and are aligned. I also like the fact that you can interchange the modules and create your own configurations. I had first thought of modular makeup when I discovered the brand Jouer. At the time I discovered Jouer, their packaging was modular.

I don’t actually know how common knowledge this was within the beauty community that Jouer had interlocking packaging but I think they executed the concept well at the time. The long pans were 2x the length of the square pans. The liquid lipsticks and mascara was also the same length as the long pans. I also liked that they managed to make the liquid lipsticks and mascaras interlocked into the system as well. This meant you could essentially carry around a nice rectangle, full face palette that was connected together. Jouer also managed to add in some Lego design into the packaging to allow for compacts to be stacked.

The geometry of the interlocking system was basically the shapes you see in jigsaw puzzles but if you turned the jigsaw piece into a long 3D shape? A rail and slider? Probably easier to understand with some images…

Created in MS Paint – just one of many graphics editor programs I am skilled at

Hopefully that makes a bit more sense. This leads me to what I dislike about the packaging. The geometry used for the interlocking system creates extrudes that stick out the side and made the compacts feel and look bulky. It’s not something you want in your makeup packaging and most likely not the aesthetic makeup companies want to exude which is why I assumed Jouer has redesigned their packaging to be less bulky and look more sleek. This is at the expense of their interlocking system, but again I’m not sure how many people were actually aware of that so it probably wasn’t a major loss for Jouer customers. Jouer have also come out with more products that really wouldn’t suit an interlocking system. They did keep the liquid lipstick packaging the same though, possibly because of tooling or the packaging wasn’t that bulky for what the product is.

Nevertheless I did explore their original interlocking geometry as well as others in my initial sketches.

Hmm I really should annotate my sketches

The other issue I found in the Jouer system was that the compacts can only be connected left and right. You can continually connect the compacts side to side but it’ll eventually become too long especially when the packaging is bulky to begin with. This was the other challenge I wanted to try and find a solution for. This lead me to researching tessellating shapes. I came out the other end understanding how to create shapes that tessellate instead of finding simple, suitable geometry that I could implement into the design, but the more you know right? Some bomb tessellating patterns I came across:

When I refocused, I started researching tiles because they tessellate, need to fit together left/right/top/bottom and usually have simple enough geometry. The reason I wanted to keep the geometry simple is because of tooling costs. The MECCA MAX shadows sell for $8 each so manufacturing costs need to be quite low and having complex geometry would increase the price of manufacturing (more on tooling and manufacturing in an upcoming post). I came across some pretty unique and beautifully designed tiles:

I eventually realised ’tiles’ wasn’t the correct term to be researching. This is because tiles have a backing plate (the wall, the ground) that they stick to that allows for quite complex shapes to fit together and stay together. I changed my search term to ‘interlocking tiles’ and I probably should’ve been able to guess that this is what would pop up:

So I made it full circle back to the initial design. Regardless, I persisted with my research and eventually came across the following image in the depths (past page 1) of Google Images:

https://www.thebudgetdm.com/interlocking-tiles // I love and find it funny when I find inspiration from badly edited images on websites that look like it was created in ’98

I played around with this concept and thought about how the tooling would work and finally arrived at a solution.

The final component I needed to design was the lid. The current MECCA MAX lid has a snap closure that extends over the side as well as a hinge that comes out the back when you open the lid. This wouldn’t work when the compacts are connected together as you wouldn’t be able to access the opening and the hinge would move the compacts. It’s the same reason the Jouer compacts couldn’t be connected up and down, only side to side.

This was a simple enough issue to fix. I had to look at repositioning the hinge and creating a way for the compact to stay closed but also being able to open it when connected together.

I’m trying to improve my sketching and I think this was a good project to start with. I also thought I did more pages of sketching but I guess not – I will try improving the diversity of my ideas and getting thought onto paper. I will also trying making these posts more succinct, they feel a bit long for the information I’m trying to get across.

Next post: breaking and making.

Single shadows and DIY palettes

PS but at the start. I realise this may not be that interesting to the everyday person or even within the product design community but for potential employers – here’s a sample of my market research and product analysis abilities.

TL;DR I am redesigning the MECCA MAX single shadow compact and making it modular.

For those that don’t know, I work another job alongside my engineering job. I work at the beauty store MECCA! Their in-house brand, MECCA MAX, released single eyeshadows a couple(?) weeks ago (the days and weeks all blur together now).

I really like the concept of single shadows because I’m sure almost everyone who owns an eyeshadow palette has a couple shadows that are barely used in the palette, I know I do. Single shadows allow you to create your own eyeshadow palette where you like and will use all the colours (ideally).

There are definitely other brands out there that do this. The single shadow is usually packaged in either their own compact (like the MECCA MAX ones), or in a plastic/cardboard sleeve. The main brands that come to mind when I think about single shadows and DIY palettes is Makeup Geek and INGLOT.

Makeup Geek was the first brand that I saw do this and I’ve always thought it was pretty clever. You can create a DIY palette with shadows and face powders (blushes, bronzers, highlighters) – whatever could fit into the magnetic palette. They use to have circular pans but have since redesigned their packaging so the pans are square. I personally like the square pans more because there are less awkwardly shaped gaps between the pans.

INGLOT has a similar system to Makeup Geek but what I adore is that the pan dimensions are relative to each other. The eyeshadow pan dimensions are 1:1 and the face pan dimensions are 2:1 so the pans fit nicely next to each other and the edges are all aligned. Because of this, there are little to no gaps when put in the palette, unlike Makeup Geek. I understand why there are sizable gaps in the Makeup Geek palettes – it’s so you can use your finger to take the pans out. With the INGLOT system you need to use a pin or a thin object in the smalls gaps of the corners between the pans to lift the pan out.

What I also like about both of these is the packaging the single shadow comes in. It’s minimal, recyclable and much less wasteful than a whole compact. The problem with single shadows coming in their own individual compact is that it’s a big waste of material (usually plastic) and manufacturing power/material when you depot the shadow. There’s not much you can do with it once you depot it other than chuck it out. Also, it can be very hard to depot. Some companies do make it easier but it still leaves the issue of a pretty useless empty compact.

It’s fixable but it’s not enjoyable. What do I do with the empty compact? 😦
https://colourpop.com/products/shadow-compact // the little hole at the bottom allows people to stick a pin through the back to pop the pan out.

There is one main thing that I dislike about the current DIY palette system: the size of the empty palettes are predetermined, which of course makes sense. However, if you don’t have enough pans to fill the palette, you end up having empty space in the palette which is a waste of space on your table or when you’re travelling with it.

You can buy smaller empty palettes but what happens when you buy more? Upgrade to a larger empty palette. But then what do you do with the now smaller empty palette? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

So that is what I have set out to do! Redesign the MECCA MAX single shadow compact to make it modular to allow for DIY palette creation without having to depot the shadow or throwing out an empty compact afterwards.

Next post: Sketching…and a little more market research!